Current:Home > MyHere's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases-LoTradeCoin
Here's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases
View Date:2024-12-24 09:34:45
The Supreme Court decided 6-3 and 6-2 that race-conscious admission policies of the University of North Carolina and Harvard College violate the Constitution, effectively bringing to an end to affirmative action in higher education through a decision that will reverberate across campuses nationwide.
The rulings fell along ideological lines. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion for both cases, and Justice Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh wrote concurring opinions. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a dissenting opinion. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has ties to Harvard and recused herself in that case, but wrote a dissent in the North Carolina case.
The ruling is the latest from the Supreme Court's conservative majority that has upended decades of precedent, including overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022.
- Read the full text of the decision
Here's how the justices split on the affirmative action cases:
Supreme Court justices who voted against affirmative action
The court's six conservatives formed the majority in each cases. Roberts' opinion was joined by Thomas, Samuel Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. The chief justice wrote that Harvard and UNC's race-based admission guidelines "cannot be reconciled with the guarantees of the Equal Protection Clause."
"Respondents' race-based admissions systems also fail to comply with the Equal Protection Clause's twin commands that race may never be used as a 'negative' and that it may not operate as a stereotype," Roberts wrote. "The First Circuit found that Harvard's consideration of race has resulted in fewer admissions of Asian-American students. Respondents' assertion that race is never a negative factor in their admissions programs cannot withstand scrutiny. College admissions are zerosum, and a benefit provided to some applicants but not to others necessarily advantages the former at the expense of the latter. "
Roberts said that prospective students should be evaluated "as an individual — not on the basis of race," although universities can still consider "an applicant's discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise."
Supreme Court justices who voted to uphold affirmative action
The court's three liberals all opposed the majority's decision to reject race as a factor in college admissions. Sotomayor's dissent was joined by Justice Elena Kagan in both cases, and by Jackson in the UNC case. Both Sotomayor and Kagan signed onto Jackson's dissent as well.
Sotomayor argued that the admissions processes are lawful under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
"The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment enshrines a guarantee of racial equality," Sotomayor wrote. "The Court long ago concluded that this guarantee can be enforced through race-conscious means in a society that is not, and has never been, colorblind."
In her dissent in the North Carolina case, Jackson recounted the long history of discrimination in the U.S. and took aim at the majority's ruling.
"With let-them-eat-cake obliviousness, today, the majority pulls the ripcord and announces 'colorblindness for all' by legal fiat," Jackson wrote. "But deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life."
Melissa Quinn contributed to this report.
- In:
- Affirmative Action
- Supreme Court of the United States
veryGood! (9818)
Related
- Maine dams face an uncertain future
- Horoscopes Today, June 23, 2024
- Alyson Stoner Addresses Whether They Actually Wanted to Be a Child Star
- Water emergency halts tourist arrivals at Italy’s popular Capri island
- How Alex Jones’ Infowars wound up in the hands of The Onion
- U.S. fast tracks air defense interceptor missiles to Ukraine ahead of other countries
- Sha'Carri Richardson on track for Paris Olympics with top 100 time in trials' opening round
- Shooting in Buffalo leaves 3-year-old boy dead and his 7-year-old sister wounded
- Engines on 1.4 million Honda vehicles might fail, so US regulators open an investigation
- USMNT vs. Bolivia Copa America updates: Christian Pulisic scores goal early
Ranking
- 'Squid Game' creator lost '8 or 9' teeth making Season 1, explains Season 2 twist
- Cruise ship rescues 68 migrants adrift in Atlantic
- Taylor Swift's Mom Andrea Reacts to Live Debut of thanK you aIMee at London Concert
- Full transcript of Face the Nation, June 23, 2024
- November 2024 full moon this week is a super moon and the beaver moon
- Prince William Dancing to Shake It Off at Taylor Swift Concert Is a Must-See Moment
- Bird flu outbreak spreads to mammals in 31 states. At least 21 cats infected. What to know
- 3 caught in Florida Panhandle rip current die a day after couple drowns off state's Atlantic coast
Recommendation
-
Secret Service Agent Allegedly Took Ex to Barack Obama’s Beach House
-
What to know about Netflix's 'Tell Them You Love Me' documentary
-
Uruguay starts Copa America campaign with 3-1 win over Panama
-
Climate Activists Blockade Citigroup’s Doors with Model Pipeline and Protest Bank’s Ties to Israel
-
Asian sesame salad sold in Wegmans supermarkets recalled over egg allergy warning
-
2 people were taken to a hospital after lightning struck a tree near a PGA Tour event in Connecticut
-
75-year-old John Force alert after fiery crash at Virginia Motorsports Park
-
Epik High's Tablo reflects on creating 'PUMP', upcoming US tour and the trio's legacy